Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Dianor Resources Inc V.DOR

TSXV:DOR - Post Discussion

Dianor Resources Inc > And how long does it typically take...
View:
Post by alwaysbroke on Apr 17, 2012 8:31pm

And how long does it typically take...

...for a forbearance agreement of this nature to close?
Comment by mcflyguy on Apr 18, 2012 8:25am
Back when they were working on splitting of quebec there was a company wanting to buy Dianor (leadbetter) but they were not wanting Quebec or they were not willing to pay for quebec so hence the spin off. When the deal fell away the split fell away also. (that was the speculation at the time.) The Quebec results one can only speculate they were not worth releasing. I think the Forbearance is fully ...more  
Comment by antero on Apr 18, 2012 10:04am
mcfly i think that it was not up to ryder on whether to release the Quebec results, he had an obligation to the shareholders to release those results, good or bad.  This play is full of blunders. Someone explain to me why ryder has not at least tried a reverse split long ago to try and make financing more attractive for financiers.  We have too many shares outstanding.  I know ...more  
Comment by mcflyguy on Apr 18, 2012 2:01pm
I have no idea why the results were not released, I thought they were paid for when we took the last Mineral Fields PP so I can only speculate they were not phenominal, if they were great why not release them. If they were great and not released or paid for, well that goes beyond pathetic. Anyways our issues are presently past quebec results, they would be fairly irrelevant at this point as it ...more  
Comment by alwaysbroke on Apr 18, 2012 4:23pm
Sorry mcflyguy but similar and proportional results from the initial sample would be a huge shot in the arm for this company.  Finding larger, fancy coloured purple diamonds from the same type of DBR as Leadbetter would likely be enough to find the funds if not for Leadbetter, then for a larger sample from Quebec.  
Comment by stockefeller on Apr 18, 2012 5:44pm
Ryder better be out there with a shovel digging enough glass to pay rent each month so he and Duval can take advantage of that $50,000 furniture upgrade to the office last year... Holding pattern continues....   -Stock
Comment by ImaginaryBoy on Apr 19, 2012 8:26am
I thought they PP they did before starting the Quebec sample was to be used to pay for the Quebec exploration. My guess is that the lab got paid, as the PP was done a head of time to cover the costs of the exploration.   Somebody suggested that perhaps the lab did not get paid , but I think they were just making excuses for Dianor.      
Comment by yoshka2000 on Apr 24, 2012 5:45pm
Just find the lab,then if they were paid in full for results,who was the reciever? Why were those results not released to the shareholders. This might get scarey for those in question. I think, there is way too much B.S. going on and not enough accountability. What R the shareholder writes with DOR? ANYONE?
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities