Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum ECUADOR GOLD AND COPPER CORP V.EGX

"Ecuador Gold and Copper Corp is a mineral exploration, mining and development company. The Company acquires and explores gold mineral rights located in Ecuador."

TSXV:EGX - Post Discussion

ECUADOR GOLD AND COPPER CORP > this board has lost its purpose
View:
Post by williecoyote on Jan 07, 2014 11:00am

this board has lost its purpose

this board has become a joke, i ask all to leave who are not serious egx people, to the egx owners lets wait for news and ignore all quotes based on emotion
Comment by testfreak on Jan 07, 2014 11:03am
I agree with williecoyote! everyone ignore the 3 clowns, if they post just ignore it. thanks guys,
Comment by korpfu on Jan 07, 2014 1:36pm
You are pretty tough hiding behind a computer screen and calling people names for asking some simple questions. 
Comment by testfreak on Jan 07, 2014 1:37pm
Well  u saying 0.03 is dd u SQUID
Comment by korpfu on Jan 07, 2014 1:40pm
Please show me the post where I said 0.03.  Again, you are tough with the name calling hiding behind a computer screen.  I won't stoop to your level. if I thought it was going to 0.03 anytime soon I would be dumping my shares.
Comment by testfreak on Jan 07, 2014 1:44pm
Sorry that was not u. That was wiseman. But do us a favour and stop talking. Thanks
Comment by korpfu on Jan 07, 2014 1:51pm
Sure, I get it, no one wants to talk about accurate factual information here. 
Comment by fleamarket on Jan 07, 2014 1:59pm
Korpfu I am wonder where you work as you may have an agenda like the other two ding dongs raising old non relevant information to todays standing. It's like saying I was always 6ft tall from birth or from birth I will always be 16 inches. It's called growth it happens over time with events. When the other 2 hit puberty they may become to understand what time vs. growth equals. To answer ...more  
Comment by TheMerlion on Jan 07, 2014 5:11pm
Korpfu, look no further if you want to discuss factual information. I have provided nothing but facts and am very much in favour of factual debate. I will converse with you if you wish because, as you can see, this board is full of PUMPERS who have no idea about the facts and are totally clueless about the industry. Abuse, yes, they are very good at that and ignoring the facts.
Comment by korpfu on Jan 08, 2014 8:23am
Thanks, I am trying to crunch some numbers at a high a level. In your opinion, putting aside the capital required to get a mine and mill running, what would you estimate the operating costs to be if we assumed the indicated and inferred to be proven.  I am looking at gold first.  Do you think $1000/oz would be out of the question?
Comment by TheMerlion on Jan 08, 2014 9:08am
Hi Korpfu. You can not make mining costs calculations with out knowing the more results. Afterall, a lot more drilling has to take place to prove up the numbers and all indications point to this being a low grade deposit at considerable depth therefore an under ground operation would be required involving a very large removal of ore to obtain a relatively low quantity of actual commercial ...more  
Comment by korpfu on Jan 08, 2014 10:01am
Thanks, I realize that you need more results, however, my calculations are assuming that the inferred and indicated are proven. So, you are suggesting that open pit/partial open pit is totally out of the question.   I guess with the gold at greater depths, some serious benching would be in order to get to the deposits, increasing the costs.  I have seen mines where part is ...more  
Comment by TheMerlion on Jan 08, 2014 12:46pm
Korpfu, you have to remember that the whole "Condor Project" consists of several different concessions and the current NI43-101 covers the the whole "Condor Project" and not just one area of interest such as Santa Barbara. The main focus in at Santa Barbara and this is where the greatest resource lies in the current NI43-101 which is (for Santa Barbara South only) 236,100,000 ...more  
Comment by TheMerlion on Jan 08, 2014 6:13pm
Korpfu, a good article worth considering in light of our discussion. https://www.explorationinsights.com/pebble.asp?relid=3443
Comment by korpfu on Jan 09, 2014 8:02am
Thank you!
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse