Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas Ltd V.EOG

Alternate Symbol(s):  ECAOF

Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas Ltd. is a Canada-based oil and gas exploration company with offshore licensed interests in Guyana, Namibia, and South Africa. The petroleum and natural gas interests of the Company are located offshore in Guyana, South Africa, and Namibia. In Guyana, the Orinduik block is situated in shallow to deep water (70m-1,400m), approximately 170 kilometers (km) offshore Guyana in the Suriname Guyana basin (Orinduik License). In Namibia, the Company holds four offshore petroleum licenses in the Republic of Namibia, being petroleum exploration license number 097 (the Cooper License), petroleum exploration license number 098 (the Sharon License), petroleum exploration license number 099 (the Guy License) and petroleum exploration license number 100 (the Tamar License). In South Africa, it holds two offshore petroleum licenses in South Africa, being petroleum exploration license number 2B (the 2B Block) and petroleum exploration license number 3B/4B (the 3B/4B Block).


TSXV:EOG - Post by User

Comment by grh525on Apr 12, 2012 10:52pm
122 Views
Post# 19788986

RE: Potential is Correct

RE: Potential is Correct

Maricopa, you come up short in trying to answer the questions. How do you think EOG NI 51-101 reports was completed by an expert independent company if they didn't have existing data to conduct the study? Did they just pull it out of thin air?

 

Here's an excerpt from the Sharon announcement:

"Gustavson conducted an assessment of the Gross Prospective Resource as of March 6, 2012. The data provided includes recently acquired 2D seismic data and reports from four wells that were drilled in the vicinity of the block. The interpretation of 605 line kilometers of 2D seismic data acquired from WesternGeco over the Sharon Block has produced two leads. The leads which are interpreted as sealed structures are identified as the "North Structure" and the "Wedge"."

 

Bullboard Posts