Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Eagle Plains Resources Ltd V.EPL

Alternate Symbol(s):  EGPLF

Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. is a Canadian based mineral exploration company operating in Western Canada exploring for gold, critical-metals, uranium, lithium, rare earth elements and industrial minerals. Its business is engaged in acquiring grassroots critical-and precious-metal exploration properties. Its projects include Acacia Project, Iron Range Project, Kalum Project, Vulcan Project, Cathro Project, Knife Lake Project, Olson Project, Schotts Lake, Dictator Project, and Elizabeth Lake Project, among others. The Acacia Project is located 60 kilometers (km) NE of Kamloops, British Columbia (BC) and cover approximately 4857 hectares (ha). The Iron Range Property is located one km NE of Creston in SE B.C and covers 70,473 ha. The Kalum Property is located 35 km NW of Terrace, BC. The Vulcan Property is located 30 km NW of the historic Sullivan Mine at Kimberley, British Columbia. The Elizabeth Lake Project cover an area of 1266 ha and are located 21 km north of La Ronge, Saskatchewan.


TSXV:EPL - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by brianjoyce2on Dec 19, 2010 6:51pm
452 Views
Post# 17868450

NU4BCRE: RE: RE: Brian

NU4BCRE: RE: RE: BrianMy opinion was based on several things:
1. The halt was late on a Friday.....so, news on a Friday is not ALWAYS negative, but usually is. Of course this was a halt not a NR but it still led me to think "uh-oh".
2. As you state, the conference call. Why do they need a conference call? It must be to do some explaining or damage control. With the super runup being based mainly on finding "Sullivan II", less than outstanding assay results, even if still really good, might lead to a need for a conference call to explain and help people understand. The assays would not have to be bad (I suspect they are good); they just have to be less than incredible, to then pop the share price and dissappoint and so management wanted to head that off.
3. We may still  be halted all day Monday. Long halts in my experience are usually, but again not always, negative.

So those points are what I based my opinion on.

Hey Nighthawk, you must be married less than 10 years. I've been married 33 and have long ago given up arguing with my wife. Husbands are always wrong and that settles it.!!!!!!

:)  :)
bj2
Bullboard Posts