NU4BCRE: RE: RE: BrianMy opinion was based on several things:
1. The halt was late on a Friday.....so, news on a Friday is not ALWAYS negative, but usually is. Of course this was a halt not a NR but it still led me to think "uh-oh".
2. As you state, the conference call. Why do they need a conference call? It must be to do some explaining or damage control. With the super runup being based mainly on finding "Sullivan II", less than outstanding assay results, even if still really good, might lead to a need for a conference call to explain and help people understand. The assays would not have to be bad (I suspect they are good); they just have to be less than incredible, to then pop the share price and dissappoint and so management wanted to head that off.
3. We may still be halted all day Monday. Long halts in my experience are usually, but again not always, negative.
So those points are what I based my opinion on.
Hey Nighthawk, you must be married less than 10 years. I've been married 33 and have long ago given up arguing with my wife. Husbands are always wrong and that settles it.!!!!!!
:) :)
bj2