RE: RE: Crow - Grey JayMy DD .... doggers disclosure , a few years back I had an interest in , NFC , Northern Financial and got in the habit of putting some of the companies they did placements with on my watch list so I think Consolidated Gold Win (EZ) has been on my watch list since 06 but I haven't followed to closely . This winter a friend had mentioned EZ and while I was looking at it a little harder it was cease traded but , no , I don't hold shares in Encore . I've become interested in the story and want to see how things play out and maybe learn something along the way .
I believe there is gold at Bonaparte , not just dirt , and I would go as far as to say it's interesting as an exploration property but it seems it has been promoted as much more especially when you read the two page fact sheet .
As far as due diligance I only know enough to be dangerous but in reading the assement reports I get the impression most of the 94 bulk sample came from the Crow and not the Raven as someone had previously mentioned .This makes sence to me in regard to the dewatering and work done on the Crow / Grey Jay. If the early resource estimate of the Crow was correct it's possible it was mined out with the 94 bulk sample this also makes sence as to why they would be working the Grey Jay but they moved to the Raven to start the decline . Why ???
"Bonaparte will be a profitable mine." well there is no defined resource , no feasability study . Even if the tonage at Kinross has good grades what does it prove ? If there are two principals involved in the actual mining who actually know what they are doing why is Bonaparte down? ... why is there only 400 tons at Kinross ? What has happened to the private placement money , the auditors , the BCSC ??? So many questions but the ones with the answers aren't saying anything IMHO .