RE: Plain to see that the disidentsYou should be ashamed.... you have provided zero reason for sols indescretions of diving into the treasury like miss piggy.
"Sol didn't get paid several times for the same expenses".... No need to have independent confirmation on Sol's part... Reminds me of the line in Chicago..." Are you going to believe what you see... or what I tell ya"... LOL
Anyone who stoops that low is too small to run a company... why not just ask for more money... pretty sleezy... just like the company he keeps.... and gets to post for him...LOL
Then there's the arm twister in the disident document " Sol will drop the lawsuit if the shareholders elect him"
Talk about sleezy.... That statement looks like extortion to me!...
This is about trust and integrety.
Sol has made no case to dismiss the other directors, but they have sure made a case to punt Sol!
Now thats just my humble opinion!