Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
News Focus
Coeur Commences Drilling at Silver North's Tim Project (click to learn more)
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Gold Canyon Resources Inc V.GCU

Metals & Mining Gold


TSXV:GCU - Post by User

Gold Canyon Resources Inc
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(22)
•••
Post by diabase1on May 29, 2012 4:06pm
319 Views
Post# 19957778

Hole 122 vs Hole 128

Hole 122 vs Hole 128

Geospot: the main zone of ~300m width was intersected in 128, but the 'core' zone was not as good in 128, as it was in 122, where 122 intersected 48m of 4.15 g/t Au.

Any thoughts?? 

<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities