Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Gold Canyon Resources Inc V.GCU

TSXV:GCU - Post Discussion

Gold Canyon Resources Inc > Board of Directors out of control, check Barrick Gold!!
View:
Post by diabase1 on Sep 17, 2013 6:26pm

Board of Directors out of control, check Barrick Gold!!

Troy Fierro:
2013:
The PDAC in March: his speech was excellent!!!!
Apr 1: the share price was about 0.48
Apr 30: the share price was about 0.30
May 31: The Management Discussion and Analysis (AGM) indicate that Troy Fierro is not the CEO anymore, but will remain as a director.
If this is the case, then discussions about Troy’s position with GCU must have started just after the PDAC.
May 31: the share price was about 0.29 
~June 28: the share price was 0.23.
June 28 - Aug 1: the share price remained around 0.23.
July 17: Tony Fierro and Richard Moritz were let go.
Why did it take from May 31 (the date that the AGM mentioned that Troy would not be kept as the CEO of GCU, to a news release of July 17?
Aug 2: GCU announces a financing at 0.23.
Aug 8: GCU closes the financing.
Aug 13: GCU ‘arranges’ to open a secondary financing again.
Aug 19: GCU closes the secondary financing offer.
That’s it!! No other news from the new, highly regarded ‘management’ of Gold Canyon.
 
With all due respect, the price of gold on:
 
Apr 1: ~1600/oz
June 28: ~1400/oz
July 17: ~1300/oz
Aug 2: ~1300/oz
Aug 19: ~1375/oz
 
My interpretation of the last few months is that GCU was running out of cash, and therefore, had to raise money. The public coffers weren’t about to hand over big money at 0.48 on Apr 1. So when things got difficult financially for GCU, they decided on a ‘private placement’. However, the ‘private placees’ wanted a good deal too, so GCU drove the share price down to 0.23.
 
The resultant money would not pay for either Fierro or Moritz salary, so they were ‘let go’.
 
On a separate note, ‘insider’ trading has always been very helpful info, in helping us other investors, to gauge whether the insider money is still staying within a company!!
 
 
 
 
The following are Transaction dates:
 
Aug 8: Quentin Hennigh         100,000 warrants privately at 0.40.
Aug 9: Sheldon Inwentash       100,000 shares in the public market at 0.29
Aug 9: Troy Fierro                   1.5M options expired
Aug 19: Pinetree                     750,000 shares privately at 0.23
Aug 19: Pinetree                     750,000 warrants privately at 0.40
Aug 19: Sheldon Inwentash     750,000 shares privately at 0.23
Aug 19: Sheldon Inwentash     750,000 warrants privately at 0.40
Aug 27: Pinetree                     100,000 shares in the public market at 0.50
Aug 27: Sheldon Inwentash     100,000 shares in the public market at 0.50
 
On that note, we know that Sheldon and Pinetree were part of the private placement announced on Aug 2/2013. Good for them!!
 
However, as I recall, there were approx 12M shares total that were involved with this private placement. Who were the other ‘investors’? Is there not a time frame, when ‘insiders’ have to report???? Sheldon and Pinetree have reported, but what about the rest of the ‘gang’ with GCU. Is this another slip up on the part of the TMX Venture Exchange in not doing their bookkeeping properly??
 
It boggles my mind, as dedicated as Sheldon Inwentash and Pinetree has been to GCU over the years; that Sheldon and Pinetree wouldn’t by now, want to carry out a ‘Bill Ackman’ style refresher, for the Board of Directors of Gold Canyon ( a clean sweep!!!).
 
Boy, do we shareholders of GCU need ‘new blood’ on the BOD, not only to lead Gold Canyon, and but especially to manage the development of the Springpole gold project!!
 
Right now, there is nobody in management to do this. With all due respect, if Richard Hall was 20 years younger, he would be ideal!! A great board member, but he’s not in management.
 
In GCU’s annual report:
 
Management income of $55,737 (2012 - $47,668) relates to management fees charged, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Kratz Spring LLC and SSE, to JOGMEC to manage the Mulanje REE and Mangochi REE Projects pursuant to the terms of the JEA. The management fees are based on a percentage of the expenditures incurred on the projects.
 
Excuse me, but if nothing happens with the REE project/negotiations on the sale, we’re still on the hook for??? What are you managing????? Remember the name Kratz Spring LLC everybody!!
 
Sheldon, phone Bill Ackman, and let’s get this nonsense over with!!
 
What do you think scoutaz, schill, GOG, Geospot (Aug 9)??
 
I noticed that there have been a few new names on this site, not that they have contributed anything??
 
Schill, GOG and Geospot used to be major contributors to the GCU board. Have they all died, or do they now use these other ‘new’ names??
Comment by 20/20/12 on Sep 18, 2013 1:59pm
Hi Thanks for the update What are we looking for at Barrick ? the F'Up board ? Globe says Barrick's Munk seen fiddling with board2013-09-18 08:23 ET - In the NewsThe Globe and Mail reports in its Wednesday edition the Peter Munk-led dynasty on Barrick Gold's board has become like a bad comedy -- seemingly endless and not that clever. The Globe's David Parkinson writes the ...more  
Comment by diabase1 on Sep 18, 2013 6:24pm
My reference to Barrick Gold is that if there is enough pressure to change their ‘board’, then why couldn’t the same thing (pressure) happen to GCU’s board?   On another note, if Barrick Gold gave John Thornton $17M to sign on, what do you think Peter Munk will get for leaving??????   Anyway, I still think, for the longer term outlook for GCU, if proper changes were made to the Board of ...more  
Comment by scoutaz2003 on Sep 19, 2013 12:08am
I guess I have to disagre with you about a change in the board.... The group leading this company has done an amazing job. While the fall from 4.00 to .19 was ...um unfortunate.  It wasn't the boards fault. If you had been payong attention they stepped up to the plate and brought on high quality people to signal that we were in the process of seriously considering building this into a ...more  
Comment by Geospot on Sep 19, 2013 12:36pm
Scoutaz seems to be one who is actually following things and is plugged in. I have been ignoring the thing and all I have heard recently is that there is a lot more gold in the ground at Springpole than the general public understands, and it will take some drilling to prove it out. That said, and as Scoutaz says, the current price doesn't have any relationship to the gold already discovered ...more  
Comment by Geospot on Sep 19, 2013 2:07pm
As a postscript, it's nice to see the mainstream financial media posting a headline about gold that is not negative. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/gold-logs-strongest-daily-gain-since-2009-2013-09-19?link=MW_home_latest_news Gold logs strongest daily gain since 2009 By Myra P. Saefong % 1 GCZ3SIZ3 Get news alerts on Gold - Electronic (COMEX) Dec 2013 ...more  
Comment by OldManWinter on Sep 19, 2013 2:13pm
Personally I think this is all short lived. I think gold will work its way lower along with GCU, especially knowing that no one is steering the ship anymore. 
Comment by Geospot on Sep 19, 2013 2:45pm
As for no one steering the ship, au contraire; personally, I think the adults stepped back into the wheelhouse. There was potentially too much money on the line here.
Comment by diabase1 on Sep 19, 2013 3:13pm
Thanks for your posts scoutaz2003 and Geospot. Appreciate it!! My views haven’t changed for a couple of directors on the board.   Geopspot, could you explain??   “As for no one steering the ship, au contraire; personally, I think the adults stepped back into the wheelhouse. There was potentially too much money on the line here”. Thanks.
Comment by scoutaz2003 on Sep 19, 2013 6:04pm
You are mistaken when you say no one is strafing the ship. The same people who ran this company for years with little dilution are still there.  They were the reason I bought before the amazing results came out of sprinPole.  Thanks to Mexico mike.   I do not know how this is all going to end but 5 million ounces of gold is a good start.  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities