Comment by
woundedknee on Jan 09, 2015 9:01am
That doesn't bother me at all. What I would take from this is to buy as much as you can at these prices. jmo
Comment by
perky38 on Jan 09, 2015 9:38am
i like Moriarty, but he is a pumper, he has steered me wrong and others.. Good Luck
Comment by
woundedknee on Jan 09, 2015 9:52am
No one is right 100% of the time. One thing he says that I'm sure most of us can agree on..it looks like someone is taking a run at GCU. gl
Comment by
Iskyhigh on Jan 09, 2015 10:36am
Since Bob wants to play reporter, he should also verify his story. He could have called Sprott before releasive his latest missive. He's coming across as desparate to me. Not much different than some of the posters on this site.
Comment by
Schill on Jan 09, 2015 11:52am
From what I know, reporting insider trades is not voluntary and the timespan is not three days, but must be reported within 14 working days on Sedar, is it?
Comment by
woundedknee on Jan 09, 2015 1:06pm
From what it says in "The Canadian Insider" you have five days to report an insider trade. There are a few exceptions such as a stock option plan or buy-backs. You have ten days to file a report stating you are an insider. One definition is.....You become an insider when you can show you own 10% of company shares.
Comment by
Schill on Jan 09, 2015 1:36pm
So it's b.llocks what Moriarty wrote. Now if someone doesn't even get these simple facts straight, how could someone be trusted what he writes about stocks?
Comment by
moonshot5 on Jan 09, 2015 1:51pm
Wouldn't it be easy to get around reporting rules with different entities? For instance, a dozen subsidiary companies of a large parent company buying up quantities of shares? Unlike Moriarty though, I do not conclude someone is making a run at this company. There are a lot of companies that have had huge volume recently, such as CCJ, and MGP.
Comment by
GBB2015 on Jan 09, 2015 7:00pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
Schill on Jan 12, 2015 12:15pm
I find it hard to believe there was no Canadian law regulating the disclosure of insider or substantial shareholder trades and that it was depending on the stock exchange only.