Busy Board LatelyLeigh; Merci for the excellent reply to me from a post a few days ago. I had to wade back through a few pages to find it and some great discussions since then.
Do you agree that the property is "only" feasible if the TF works as anticipated, as stated by one of the other posters? And if you have time or the inclination, can you help me with a technical question?
I have this other company that released some mediocre results recently, but there was a big reading on one of the holes over a short width...I'm not here to pump the company but a quick look at the results are here...and I am referring specifically to BR_NCA_DDH6
https://www.chapleauresources.com/news.php?NewsID=119
My question is about the nature of these mineralizations; is that finding 50g/t over .5 m an anomoaly of note or insignificant? Is it an anomaly at all? Does it say anything to help interpret the geology involved? I suspect everyone would enjoy and benefit from any info you can share that aides in interpreting such results in general. The market shrugged it off, btw.
Still having a close look at RMI and almost got in today but had something else on the list first. It sure has been in a tight range all the while I've been looking into it. The recent bump did not sustain itself at all, and its down on a 200 point TSE day; no doubt she's under the radar! Hard one to figure out with some amount of production risk already mitigated and yet still seemingly valued as mere spec...hard to value TF...maybe its still a little too hard a story for many in the market to understand or not being well enough told yet, however they are "early days" as these things go.
All the best;