Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum GRAND POWER LOGISTICS GROUP INC. V.GPW

"Grand Power Logistics Group Inc through its subsidiary provides air-freight forwarding and sea-freight services, customs brokerage, logistics, warehousing and distribution, as well as other value added services."

TSXV:GPW - Post Discussion

View:
Post by moneymaker75 on Aug 30, 2014 10:27pm

TSLA vs GPW

Let's say skiboyy was right and that GPW is having such a big problem making money with $20M in quarterly revenue. Well let's take a look at Tesla's last quarter:

$770M in revenue
$29M operating loss
$62M overall loss

If GPW has problems, then TSLA has REALLY BIG problems making money. But TSLA has a $33 billion market cap. And the price to sales ratio is 13.5 compared to GPW which is 0.07. And it's stock price has gone up nearly tenfold in the last two years.

https://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=TSLA+Key+Statistics

Really skiboyy, you should just delete your account and never post again because that post was embarassingly bad. Not only was the main point of your argument wrong because you misread the numbers, your argument itself has a demonstrated flaw because there are many examples of companies which lose money for years on end and have high valuations. GPW has a low valuation and overall makes income of 1-3 EPS if you have reviewed the last two years. 

An argument with merit would be because GPW is a Chinese stock and they have some tainted history. At least that makes sense. But even that argument is losing steam because many Chinese stocks have aggressive growth multiples too and GPW is based much more in Hong Kong over mainland China.
Comment by lrpepin1 on Aug 30, 2014 10:40pm
good one on the tesla people are nuts
Comment by skiboyy on Aug 31, 2014 12:21pm
hahaha great argurment buddy, I always love it when the obvious pumpers make these great comparisons. GPW to Tesla.....one is a crappy startup chinese shipping company, the other is a multinational known world wide. You must be one of those guys comparing keek to facebook.  This company is shady and has horrible margins= that is why the price is so low and will remain low. Maybe if they start ...more  
Comment by moneymaker75 on Aug 31, 2014 12:58pm
Nice evasion of the issue at hand. Revenue is revenue and earnings is earnings. You made a ridiculous argument about this profitable and growing company that it's not worth a buy at 6.5 cents because it has too much revenue for the earnings...lol. The P/E is still 3 no matter if they have margins of 8% or 98%.  I gave you an example where the market clearly thinks your argument is ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse