RE:Shneps, this is not the Captiva message boardSven,
Do you honestly believe the following two points are not relevent to GRB shareholders :
1. There is an option agreement in place between GRB and PWR for 50% of the net profits for Sage Ranch which according to the Altus report is $174M divided by two is $87M GRB shareholders may or may not receive. The fact that Jeff is the CEO of both GRB and PWR in my opinion has created a significant conflict of interest if the joint venture agreement is not executed.
Yes, the premise was that the revenues generated from Solargram would continue to fund Sage to the building stage. Nbinvestor11 is absolutely correct in there are avenues available for funding.
I personally think $87M is very relevent to this board.
2. The gentlemen whose company (Phantom Developments) has issued a purchase offer for Sage Ranch that has not been declared as a non-arms length transaction, is not only a significant shareholder of both GRB and PWR but has know been issued 2,000,000 options for consulting services at PWR.
I personally think that is very relevent.
To be honest it may not be pumping the stock with these questions but I find it extremely relevent to the overall performance of the stocks (both GRB and PWR).
The discussion board is for good and bad discussions not just total bias promotion.
You can't possibly believe the 100-200 people that read here, out of 15,000 shareholders, where the majority of the shares are tightly held makes a significant difference.
Good luck with your choices.