RE:More defamation from Shneps within only 20 minutesMy comments in green.
1. What have the parties actually "come to consensus on" related to the Montalva project moving forward? Defined.
PREPA and Greenbriar are in a strict NDA and the public will know the details once PREPA agrees to make it public. I know what the consensus is, and that is why there is a trading black-out.
Fair enough response although the blackout period NR stated it was for far more then just one announcement. It was just an unfortunate thing that Clifford Webb and Bill Sunderland bought shares during the blackout period I guess.
Note: The Costa Sur Unit #5 recently came back on line adding an additional 200MW of electricity to an already overloaded/unstable transmission system. The transmission line that Montalva is to "tap" directly into is budgeted for $90M in upgrades with studies beginning in 2023.
That line can accomodate Montalva right now and the upgrades are for increasing capacity much beyond Montalva. What is your point?
Your own studies stated the line was not good and lacked capacity therefore you wanted to run a new transmission line at a significant cost. You had even acquired the land lease agreements from the government to do so. Why spend $15M-$20M of an unneeded expense if it wasn't necessary. It will take a long time before that new line becomes operational (if or when it happens). That's is my point.
2. Why has Ronnie Strasser (Phantom Developments) not been disclosed as having substantial influence and ownership over the 5 acre parcel (purchased from the City) and the 28.75 acre located north of W. Valley Blvd? Jeff Chiachurski and GRB have both stated these lands are part of the Sage Ranch lands known as the "property".
Now you have defamed Ronnie Strasser. Ronnie or Phantom have zero influence over the 5 acres and Ronnie never purchased the 5 acres (that were never owned by Greenbriar ever) from the City. The 28.75 acres were never part of Sage Ranch, ever. It was never part of anything we did with the City. More defamation Shneps.
I guess Kern County records are fake. No problem.
As for the 28.75 acres GRB's MD&A states "The Sage Ranch Project" is comprised of the following parcels -
The legal description of each parcel is as follows:
• Parcel 1 – APN 417-012-01 (approx. 32.97 acres)
• Parcel 2 – APN 417-012-28 (approx. 60 acres)
• Parcel 3 – APN 417-012-27 (approx. 20 acres)
• Parcel 4 – APN 417-012-25 (approx. 19.16 acres)
• Parcel 5 – APN 415-012-14 (approx. 28.75 acres)
Just fake news?
Note: Ronnie Strasser is documented as the shareholder purchasing the water rights from H Star Investments LLC.
Search under the following link - Strasser Ronnie, Strasser Sabrina, Greenbriar Capital US LLC, Jeff Ciachurski. (search under Grantor/Grantee) Lots of ownership changes but Jeff et al like doing this because each transaction is for more money. Shhh....
Full defamation here against you Shneppy. Any private person or corporation can buy water rights, you included. Each transaction is for more money? Yes, the value of water keeps going up. You are implying and you are accusing me here of self dealing in the context of your post.
My point is that Ronnie Strasser has been involved with those properties since 2017 and they have changed hands multiple times. Why? And they paid more for the properties each time. Why? Posters have been asking who bought water rights and I showed who bought water rights recently. My personal opinion is they are likely for the 28.75 acre property.
https://recorderonline.co.kern.ca.us/
3. On September 12th 2021 Sage Ranch received it's approval of a Master Development Plan.
As per the Tehachapi Zoning Code the Master Development Approval has now expired - "If the applicant fails to submit a precise development plan for the first increment within twelve months after approval of the final master development plan or fails to proceed with subsequent increments in accordance with development schedules as submitted, the master development plan shall be considered void and a new application for master development plan must be initiated in accordance with the procedures of this chapter."
The City has no problem accepting and fast tracking our PDP. You are saying our MDP is voided. Defamation again Shneps
I'm saying according to the City Zoning Code it has expired. This is a fact.
Note: The submittal of the PDP isn't expected for another 6-8 weeks and then an (8) week approval period + permitting, etc.. This has certainly blown the Q1 2022 out an entire year (and that's if they don't have to submit a new Master Development Plan)
Nothing is blown out a full year. More defamation from Shneps.
Your reported official documents stated the full PDP would be received by Q1 2022. That was a fact (at the time) and you have stated the PDP will be submitted hopefully sometime in November with a 60 day approval period.
That is Q1 2023.
Why was stated to be expected in Q1 2022 and then delayed this long?