RE:RE:RE:Water shneps wrote: I don't see anything that is "confidential" about the agreement. Within ten days of the water purchases the information is registered in the public domain under the Kern County Assessor's Office. Jeff has been discussing the agreement and has even put out news releases related too it.
My question would more likely be, "Why do I need a clause in the agreement like that?"
No, the agreement itself isn't confidential, but whether or not Strasser's water rights end up attached to Sage Ranch certainly is, as that is VERY material non-public info.
The poster Samren, whoever he really is, posted (twice) that GRB didn't have the water, which, since he seems to pretend to be Strasser, indicated that his water rights weren't going to GRB, or Sage.
Then we had the supposed meeting between the actual Strasser and the city about selling his water rights to the city, a meeting that Samren claims never happened?
Then we have Samren saying that Strasser's water rights are still locked up by the agreement with GRB? So how could Strasser negotiate selling those rights to the city? Did the city not know about the option agreement between Strasser and GRB? Are they that out to lunch?
If anyone can follow all of this soap opera bs and make any sense of it, you deserve a prize.
I don't think I have ever seen a situation where insiders, real or imaginary, were so involved in a Stockhouse bullboard. Whether that is a good thing or not, I will leave to others to decide. JMO