Post by
tylerreddick on Apr 12, 2024 9:49am
889900
You claim that insiders would be selling if there were problems. But how many brain cells does it take to realise they cannot sell, as there simply aren't enough buyers to absorb anything but a trivial number of sell orders.
Duh?
Comment by
shneps on Apr 12, 2024 10:11am
You seem to miss that there are only a few insiders. When Alberta collapsed those shares owned were bought privately. I have also shown how there are numerous insider transaction reports that were significantly delayed from when they actually occurred. Are sells being timely submitted?
Comment by
tylerreddick on Apr 12, 2024 10:21am
Indeed, which makes it even more difficult for them to unload their positions as the poster 889900 suggests would be happening if there was bad news. Anyone who buys major positions in a stock like this knows that selling on the open market is not likely going to be an option. They are pretty much stuck, and will either sink or swim with the success, or not, of the company. JMO
Comment by
shneps on Apr 12, 2024 10:12am
You seem to miss that there are only a few insiders. When Alberta collapsed those shares owned were bought privately. I have also shown how there are numerous insider transaction reports that were significantly delayed from when they actually occurred.@ Are sells being timely submitted?