Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc V.GRB

Alternate Symbol(s):  GEBRF

Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc., formerly Greenbriar Capital Corp., is a developer of entry-level sustainable housing, renewable energy, green technologies and sustainable investment projects. It is primarily involved in the acquisition and development of wind and solar energy farms in the United States and renewable energy projects in Canada. It is focused on its three primary projects... see more

TSXV:GRB - Post Discussion

View:
Comment by tylerreddick on May 06, 2024 8:16am
In this case, it appears that the Water District are just being jerks. Why they wouldn't allow pumping credits for a new recharge source, no matter the original water source, makes it appear that either they want to keep the city hostage to their water supply, or they simply don't want Tehachapi to grow. This is small-town politics at its worst, but oh so typical.
Comment by shneps on May 06, 2024 8:50am
I tend to agree but not having all the facts from both sides (just the City complaint) makes it difficult to ascertain what each side has perceives as to what is a "credit". A few observations: - The City seems to state that all the treated waste water credits should be theirs less the 6% evaporation rate and an annual 20AF "left behind" (basically a basin bonus annually). - ...more  
Comment by tylerreddick on May 06, 2024 8:54am
All good points. It would be interesting to see the original MOU and what the Water District has decided it doesn't like under today's conditions.
Comment by shneps on May 06, 2024 8:59am
It is attached to the article. Just click and open.
Comment by tylerreddick on May 06, 2024 9:54am
Thanks shneps, missed that. Looking at the MOU, I do see an issue in the fact that the recharge site at Blackburn Dam is a fair distance from where the majority of water extraction wells are located. The MOU is pretty generous to the city, as they would be given credits for every gallon of wastewater minus only evaporation. If some of that water doesn't make it to the area of highest ...more  
Comment by shneps on May 06, 2024 9:01am
Sorry, this line should say, "If the City was not capturing this storm water it would be naturally returning to the basin."
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities