Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

CO2 GRO Inc V.GROW

Alternate Symbol(s):  BLONF

CO2 GRO Inc. is a Canada-based precision ag-tech company. The Company is focused on delivering CO2 Delivery Solutions to the global protected agricultural sector. Its patented technology helps growers increase crop yields and profits by enhancing plant growth, resilience, quality and water-use efficiency through aqueous CO2 misting. It is fostering sustainable agriculture practices and reducing the industry's environmental footprint. The Company operates in Canada, the United States and the European Union.


TSXV:GROW - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by Hoovesonon Apr 20, 2018 2:32am
94 Views
Post# 27915583

Downside

DownsideMAt the AGM someone asked what the greatest threat was, and the answer given wasn’t related to financing. GROW is a relatively low-cost model given that they’re beyond the development stage. The greatest threat they suggested was that management may not be able to keep up with pressure to scale. To me that only means that they would be in a position to be bought out by an entity with the resources and capabilities to scale to a level that meets demand. Not the worst problem to have, though it means they would have to have the means to negotiate that kind of deal to benefit of the shareholders. And it assumes that someone wiould want to spend their hard-earned resources on scaling this operation. But even if cannabis trials turn up a bust, or HC exemption is a no-go, we still have outdoor California agricultural trials coming up in the summer, and with that we are competing with NO other option for outdoor CO2 enhancement. That is big for me, and a reason I m investing. I While it sounds like a cliche, I do think we’re just getting started. 
Bullboard Posts