RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Some one is selling into the bid thank you. I don’t see the data being anything other than positive overall, based on the fact that 0% of outdoor crops can benefit from CO2. And we ALL know that CO2 is currently used (via gassing) everywhere possible in indoor situations. But not all data will be the same. Some plants/situations will benefit more than others. And there may be some data that is underwhelming which will lead us to focus on the clear successes. I agree, data is key. But I believe data will be used to steer us to the most lucrative industries. And it will clearly inform the degree and speed, as you suggest, of our success. But I don’t see it as a reality that we receive any data that leads to the decline of this company. Keep in mind with our initial university trial we saw an increase in lettuce biomass if 100%. A pretty impressive start I would say.