RE:For those possibly in doubtNice post stockbull, as always! Like the point about gassing being phased out completely. Was reading this post released today on a U.N study focused on global food production and read this little bit that reminded me of your post. Articles posted at end, really interesting read.
Feeding the undernourished and making our food system more sustainable “are complementary and closely interdependent,” the report’s authors write. Both can be done through major policy changes that mandate and incentivize sustainable landscape planning and agricultural procedures, and empowering consumers and food producers to transform supply chains. That may sound like wonkish jargon, but here’s an example: Major commodity farm producers in the U.S. have access to insurance and subsidies while small, organic, sustainable farms don’t. In a bad year, commodity farmers have options to recoup some of their losses, sustainable farms often go out of business. https://www.boulderweekly.com/cuisine/a-food-persepctive-on-the-u-n-s-study-on-potential-extinction-of-1-million-species/ stockbull72 wrote: An outside article on carbon capture at end here that should help one realize along with carbon taxes being implemented abroad, that the use of Co2 gas may just go way of the dinosaurs with emphasis being put on the production and release of co2 into the air. For what's all going on now, I'd not be surprised if co2 gassing gets phased out over the coming years and law is written against the use of co2 gassing due to it being contradictory to what is happening right now as far as reducing co2 in the atmosphere to help stave off global temp increases. Co2 foliar could end up being mandated in some form along the lines, if EPA and govt bodies concerned with human health start squawking. https://phys.org/news/2019-05-iceland-carbon-dioxide-cleaner-air.html