Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Gensource Potash Corp V.GSP

Alternate Symbol(s):  AGCCF

Gensource Potash Corporation is a Canada-based fertilizer development company. The Company is focused on developing resource opportunities with a specific focus on potash development. The Company operates under a business plan that has two key components: vertical integration with the market to ensure that all production capacity built is directed, and pre-sold, to a specific market, eliminating market-side risk; and technical innovation, which allows for a modular and economic potash production facility, which demonstrates environmental leadership within the industry, producing no salt tailings, therefore eliminating decommissioning. Its projects include Tugaske Project, Vanguard Area and Lazlo Area. The Vanguard Area is 100% owned in central Saskatchewan, located 170 kilometers (km) South of Saskatoon, 150 km North-West of Regina on a provincial highway system. The Lazlo Area is located in central Saskatchewan.


TSXV:GSP - Post by User

Comment by mdjbrownon Oct 24, 2022 10:35am
153 Views
Post# 35043486

RE:RE:RE:GSP

RE:RE:RE:GSPsw248, all of these junior potash hopefuls are in a really tough spot right now.

Super high natural gas prices currently seen will dramatically increase costs of any mines OPEX, and as all of these solution mines are heavily reliant on natural gas, what is the break even number for economic feasibility?       These juniors rely on FS reports to obtain financing from deep pockets and if the numbers dont line up, well you know where that discussion ends.

GSP is also relying on an unproven technology, so that is firmy entrenched in the unknown column.

Add that to the fact that potash is and always has been a cyclical commodity, and with the western sanctions hampering shipping of Russian and Belarusian potash, the other major global producers have ramped up production to capitalize on Russias restrictions.

Sad reality though, is although heavily restricted, Russian potash is still being sold and delivered, so at some point a global over supply will occur knocking prices way back down to earth, and with all of these juniors at least 3 years away from production, where in the cycle does that construction timeline fall?

Ideally if GSP commenced construction when ESSELs involvement was announced, the mine may have been built already, and GSP could capitalize on these sky high potash prices, but it wasnt and isnt

This is no revalation to big money, so where does that leave these junior potash hopefuls having to rely on big money to get a shovel in the ground.  The time to prosper from high potash prices is being in production already, not chasing a current market hoping it will still be there 3 years from now.

Westerns progress has been much slower than I expected once they announced their full steam ahead strategy, so it is difficult to know if their cavern tweaks are increasing surface dissolutionin rates or not.

Lets see how Beechy / PADCOM mine makes out in a few months time, as their success may shine a glimmer of light on the other potash hopefuls relying on similiar technology.

The Beechy group has been in this game for decades trying to perfect this technology and have proven successful bench testing and computer modelling of their techniques on several levels,  but that is much different than actual mining.   

Theoretical does not always equate to factual and if Harvey and his team cant pull this salty rabbit out of the hat, I dont know who can..............





<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>