RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: News out and it's DISTRACTINGObviously I would have liked more coal in the first set of holes. What one should keep in mind that is that the coal in the Pine River claims area is about 175 km away, on strike/ trend from Border, and the GXS Pine River claim group is around 41000 hectares, so there is plenty of room for them to look. Possibly the "matrix" needs a tweak to allow for reduced overburden and absent (erosionally challenged) geological units compared to Border. The potential stripping ratios should be much improved in the MB claims compared to Border, as long as decent thicknesses of coal are intercepted. They wont have to hit much coal at 10-40 meters depth.
IMHO
HT