Jusr reading up on the Barker report - Ace claims.
interesting write up on Ace claims.
- There's upto
12m - overburden depth in some areas on the cliams.
- The former explorer spent an incredible amount of time trying to assciaite the float rocks to
the ace claims
- i thought to myself, if the float rocks are sulphide and quartz and are with good gold,
and are partlly upside the range - the smartest move a geo could make is head up the
moiuntain
- if the float rocks are indigenous to the mountain they would come from above and fall below
- testing at depth atop the ramge would instantly determine if the floaters are from mountain.
- in this report - turns out not only bismuth but -
lead - is a huge pathfinder - tied to gold
- as i was reading the report - they did drill ace claims...
- they ran into 81 meters of felsic rock, with small sections of sulphides, argilites.
- when i read felsic - i cringed and said - did they at least check - for copper ?
-
side note - in my area, i came across a felsic outcrop ( surprise ) there's chalcopyrite with in.
- with a turn of a page with in the ace report - sure enough - copper was found in the felsics.
- so... 81m felsic in one of the drill holes and 40m feldic intercept in another drill hole.
- copper presence is... on ace claims...
- when i read argilites - i instantly thought of..,
Spanish mountain, much of thier gold is in the argilites. Something to notate - for ace claims.
Turns out, the rock float train runs - 8 km long.
That's pretty long = 8,000m
Big gold is in the float rocks...
What does one do ?
Does one spend forever to tie the float rocks to the mountain or,
Look at the float rocks and ask, how many of these floaters are on the 8 km stretch / train ?
These floaters up to 1m in size or larger,
may have come from atop the mountain and parked along side the lower portion of the mountain and became resistent points for other rocks to accumilate - hypothesis -
If so, it's logical to think - check atop the mountain to see if same rock - occures.
They also found - pyrites - which could be an excellent indicator for potential, chalcopyite...
Eirther or, fact remains,
there's numerous floaters along the 8km stretch.
What was not in the report was intel descibing the - pit digs -
Were there more - floaters - at depth as one dug pits and trenched ?
Suppose there were more floaters at depth, one then has to question,
could there be enough tonnage to support a - resource ?
Yup, check atop the mountain,
perform a few pit figs to see if the range supports fractured rocks that vroke away
test to see if the geology of rock matches the floaters that lye below -
Felsic rock - does contain quartz, finer quartz.
Could be a case of, the felsic rock at lower range and 81m down hole is homoganous
to the range and perhaps the upper range produces a more quality quartz such as the floaters
On page 18 it's said,
one of the surprise finds was - GARNETS - inbedded in rocks - i wonder what size they are ?
How much is garnet worth today?
FOUND THIS ON THE WEB -
They tend to range from around $500 a carat with inclusions, up to around $7000 per carat for the larger, clean stones. The most valuable garnet is Demantoid and it's priced near the top of the spectrum.Dec. 2, 2020
Whose located north of Ace claims ? ( preactically adjacenent )
Whose new owner of, Barkerville Mines and owns massive tracks of lands nearby ?
Osisko. 2016 - press excerpt - revealing Barkerville's interest in Barker Mineral claim(s) . After property assessments on Barker’s property package in 2016, Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. expressed an interest in purchasing Barker Mineral’s Ace, Frank Creek, Kangaroo, Rollie and Simlock projects. After preliminary discussions and negotiations, a purchase price could not be agreed upon as a multiple property package deal. Among other aspects, the regional and local geology, geophysics, geochemistry, access and infrastructure, proximity to existing mines, historical information and the short to medium term gold market directions are the factors determining the approximate fair market value Barker’s projects. There are no current discussions underway between Barker Minerals Ltd. and Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. MAKES ONE WONDER IF,
There's stil linterest in the Ace claims and other claims Hawkeye owns.
Sure hope there's no " tinkering " holding this stock down in price.
Like who shorts a stock sitting @ 2 cents...?
Let it rise so the junior can explore thier claim properly.
Without dilution.
Link to - Ace tech report - https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/47748664/technical-report-on-the-ace-property-barker-minerals-ltd I'll sift the rest of the tech report, if i see anytihng that stands out - ii'll post.
Not sure if they own Harvey creek or other locations mentioned in the tech report-
wish HAWKEYE would make better maps to identify what exactly they own in referecnce to
this historical tech report.
Cheers....