RE:RE:RE:Frank Holmes Interview with small cap powerYou are reading comprehension deficient. You even copy and paste something and can't read it.
"I am not saying they are the same thing but if things did crash outside the normal leverage situation..."
You just shoot from the hip on everything in life? I guess so.
So if it has so much utlitiy why did it crash without any underlying leverage situation?
I will tell you. Professionals were sellng to amatuers or shorting to amatuers. And spare us the uptick rule. Stocks went down just fine with the uptick rule. Or that Hedge fund manager or Fidelity blah blah. All hedge funds are in the money are they? Everything Fidelity touches is a gainer? As I say straight from the hip to whatever you see on youtube. You cant think critically. The CEO says something happened for no reason and then gives no theory as to why it will just reverse. Oh and he can say it has reversed? from $80 to here? after falling from well over $1000? Snap the fingers...its gone from $80 to here.
But mainly read what the he ll it is you are commenting on.
And you and Frank are either the same person or as I say you have the same logical DNA or illogical DNA.
As I say his big theory on cryptos is that this crash appears to have happened for no reason because leverage was not an issue. Well tullips were not a leverage issue. The French Buying into the swamps of Lousiana was not a leverage issue. That is my point. You read I am saying an ETH coin is a fkng Tullip? You are totally fn nuts. But everyone knows that
C O M P R E H E N S I O N. Try it. You actually would not be such a bigot maybe if you could just read what people say.