Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum HPQ Silicon Inc V.HPQ

Alternate Symbol(s):  HPQFF

HPQ Silicon Inc. (HPQ) is a Canada-based technology company specializing in green engineering of silica and silicon-based materials. The Company is engaged in developing, with the support of technology partners PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (PyroGenesis) and Novacium SAS, new green processes to make the critical materials needed to reach net zero emissions. Its activities are centered around the... see more

TSXV:HPQ - Post Discussion

HPQ Silicon Inc > Nano Technology Didn't Work?
View:
Post by NotElonMusk on Jun 06, 2024 9:36am

Nano Technology Didn't Work?

In most recent interview at the 13:36 mark Bernard says the nano technology didn't work. Is he talking about nano silicon? Can somebody elaborate - is he referring to something else? It was my understanding nano-si hadn't been put into the "didn't work" bucket. My understanding was that sub 150nm silicon was being produced in a single step by HPQ and the process worked just fine.

 

Comment by Thinkbigsti69 on Jun 06, 2024 10:16am
INTELLECTUAL PROTECTION FOR THE PUREVAPTM NSiR TECHNOLOGIES As of the end of fiscal 2022, the company's PUREVAPTM NSiR patent portfolio consisted of one patent acquired from PyroGenesis Canada Inc. by HPQ Nano Silicon Powders Inc (HPQ NANO) (a 100% HPQ owned subsidiary) in 2020. The patent covers the “Nano-silicon particles/wire production by arc furnace for rechargeable batteries”. This ...more  
Comment by cashbag101 on Jun 06, 2024 11:32am
HPQ gave up on nano silicon for a couple of reasons,the nano silicon that they produced contain a level of oxygen that was above what was required, they attempted to fix it by rebuilding the reactor,that failed ,shortly after they shelved the project to concentrate their resources on the QRR.During this time battery materials started to move away form nano silicon,because of the fracturing of the ...more  
Comment by cashbag101 on Jun 06, 2024 11:41am
If oxygen in the nano Si is a problem, and SiOx is the latest thing for battery material,why not turn the lemons into lemonade by controlling the amount of oxygen and trans form the Nano Si into SiOx battery material, Novasium is ,afaik,ball milling Si to near nano size and entraining oxygen into it while milling to make SiOx, maybe it's cost prohibitive to use the nano reactor?
Comment by BCONTVentures on Jun 06, 2024 12:01pm
Keep in mind that Tekna Powders also "abandoned/mothballed" their work on Nano Silicon powders (due to changes in the market/market demand). Give Bernard and Team credit for having the ability to pivot as required. Very impressive the journey from the Uragold days to today's HPQ Silicon.
Comment by Mostlyserious on Jun 06, 2024 12:56pm
I would managements much more credit when they not spent money and time on something that was abandoned.  That would be the real foresight. I believe HPQ paid PYR $3.5 million for the Purevap NSiR technology and gave it back for free this year.  
Comment by cashbag101 on Jun 06, 2024 12:58pm
If you wish to increase your successes,you must increase your failures!
Comment by Mostlyserious on Jun 06, 2024 4:49pm
Not quite the way I would put it but I can nuance this to a point where I could include some qualifiers to agree with what i think you are trying to say.