Hillcrest Energy Technologies Ltd V.HRH

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Thane Heins - New RegenX video

[ScarletSpider]

when I watched what Thane talks about i am not as concerned about the tech working on a hybrid basis of converting gas energy to power the electric one which increases the strength to keep enough power going for the generator to kick in and run on a certain charge strength without needing further gas to fuel it. It appears from what I can see as a lay person this will work. What becomes problematic is when someone asks him about the electric vehicle where there is certain amount of inertia and energy to feed the motors as he is saying there will be two to go in a perpetual loop and can do so when idling once that force has been created. According to the known science this loop is not possible this is what if I am remembering correctly called Lans Law. Now let's say you have the generators and looking to capture the energy if the energy is too great it will likely fry the motors but leaving that aside those who are not believing in what Thane is doing are stating that creating this energy in a loop is not possible as it will fry the motors and too date nobody has figured it out. Exros tech sounds very similar actually so I am not too sure what people are working with. I dont know if either company have the answer and all these testing at exro seems like partial answers and why i believe we havent fully seen a commercial roll out but tech being continuously tested. I dont know if i would trust exro either now given what i am seeing. There is one way which i think is way better if they want a perpetual circuit providing that wasnt just being touted and worked and that is a vanadium solution. There was a company called vrb many years back the last of which may have existed up to 2005 and was sold to a Chinese company. If I were to trust anything that would be the tech or hydrogen fuel cells or cells that power the vehicle not depending on a tech that looks still some years away. The problem doesnt seem to be the generation as much as sustaining it without trying the motors. This doesnt look like something that will be solved very fast if at all. That said high risk high rewards and given probabilities if I position in things this may make up only 10 to 20 percent of my holdings. I would look to other things less risky and less time consuming. That said if people can tie monies up understand that this is a very high risk investment which may or may not fly and are ok with it not getting angry etc then do so. My best understanding as a lay person with the type of tech companies are looking to here is to break a law that has proven not to be broken...something Poet Technologies was trying to do with Moores Law and to be honest I am not entirely sure if the company was successful as they did not fully achieve what they were after but have achieved measured amounts of it. I would be extremely pragmatic with this and any other company trying to break long standing laws. I am not only unconvinced here but it extends to exro as well as I said if that is what they are doing and again from a lay person's perspective I strongly believe it is. It is one thing to say a ion lithium cell runs further on a single charge and is the main source of powering something vs something underplaying and powering it with what appears to be charges and loops making a magnetic field and as such a proper one where things dont combust and that is what this looks to be trying to get at. Anyways, i will likely hold what i have and wait to see where things go and i may even think it may not be wise to put more money in even if this does what exro is i dont think the science supports what either company is doing if it did exro would have had something decisively done and it hasn't. I would be extremely careful with this side of the sector and gamble pragmatically because this is among the bigger gambles you can make. Just a very honest opinion. I will not increase my risk by size of position because I dont have anything to gamble away. It's ok if one takes a risk but I wouldnt put more than 20 percent into something like this. Sure potential of huge payout but also equally huge loss. Good luck everyone I really hope this works I still have skin here thankfully not huge amounts and most likely not large amounts. Loved the idea but sad to see there is a huge undertaking as to what is looking to be done here. I hope the company has more tech. I dont doubt the hybrid will work but the one for ev that is going by a very tough one. As far as wind as long as the units dont get fried that seems to sound ok but again I am a lay person so who knows overall. Do your own DD and just be smart with your positioning and what companies are doing. Use common sense ask yourself and others questions and if you find they are not adding up time to adjust if not get full out of your position. Sorry folks to rain on anyone's parade I am doing this as neutrally as possible I dont like or want to lose money but I know when you gamble that is likely but I can always control that and play the probabilities the ev source is a very long shot I would be careful with itm