gordie9/flexy6You both seem to be on the right track. I don't believe you call it a fertilizer either. The results are far better, with less application, therefore cheaper for agriculture. Also, it prevents plant disease. It does not hurt the enviornment, or the water table. This is the problem that is hurting much of the drinking water in NAmerica. The end products (whether fruits, vegetables, or plants) seem to be stronger, bigger, and lacking disease. In terms of share price, I too can't believe the level at which the shares are priced. I do know that management owns over 40% of the company though. I also know, that the company is not actively letting the world know. Flexy, the news release you posted the other day should fix the exposure this company needs. If these experts can write up what the benefits for agriculture are, believe me, the world will find out.