RE: Time is MoneyIn respect to Ballard, you neglect to mention that they had iron-clad patents.
My point in respect to IBR is--If all IBR has is a composting process, as you have repeated over and over, why is it necessary for Salcon to want anything from them? As you so unnecessarily pointed out, the natural process of decay (composting) has been going on since the beginning of time.
The Canadian News service describes IBR as one of a number of Vancouver-based penny stocks with composting and manure promotions. This image is the one perpetuated by the Canacord appointed directors and the rest of the Dixon group. Not taking steps to correct this deplorable image which, I believe, could have been quite easily accomplished, is the failure of a management with another agenda which cannot be identified with the interests of shareholders.
I, a few posts back, described what I believe the IBR people possess (Their fertilizer and its effectiveness). Not one of the Van Dyk attack- dogs has even attempted to dispute or challenge my post on the merits. That should tell the story for rational observers and non-compost promoters and their fellow travelers.
Since the news media has made it abundantly clear what they think of composting as a commercial fertilizer and how they feel about compost promoters, I think that it is about time, you people, find out what IBR fertilizer is all about or leave this forum.