RE: Time is MoneyI have never claimed to be a compost promoter since 1973 as you have. In fact, I have never claimed to have any of the expertise you claim to have. I positively am not contributing to this forum for the purpose of responding to your childish questions only aimed at boosting your ego. I do not know who Mr. Dinel is and I do not have the slightest idea of what the percentage of completion of the IBR process is and I question whether any shareholders reading these posts care.
If you believe they do want this information and you have it, why do you ask me if I have it? Why, in God’s name, don’t you share this information with your fellow shareholders?
Who are you trying to make brownie points with?
Now, the question I ask you to answer is not a technical question and some shareholders may be wondering about the answer. Why is the government of China paying 7 million dollars to IBR for the rights to what you describe as just as another composting technology?
This question can be answered with no technical expertise what so ever. It is a common sense question and any person with the ability to reason is capable of framing an answer, except a moron, which is my classification of you.
Your technique is clear to every thinking shareholder reading your posts. When you are asked a question that you have chosen not to answer, you duck the question by framing a technical question that is supposed to be evidence of superior knowledge. For your information, I read you for an absolute phony that has an agenda that is shareholder negative.
I ask you a simple question, not a technical one, in response to your statement that IBR is cash poor. I ask you simply what does that mean. I ask you, why don’t you tell us how much money the company has today in the bank and give us an estimate of what you think they will have six weeks from now. You have implied that you know what the company’s financial position is. Why don’t you tell us so the people can find out how much you really do know? I personally do not believe you know anything about this company and that is why you do not tell anybody anything except what a successful compost promoter you have been for the last 29 years.
In reality, you are as phony as a three-dollar bill, trying to con everybody on this forum with your technical expertise but I do not think you are fooling that many people any longer.
You talk about the stock going down today because Ben is back. Well, the shareholders voted Ben back ten to one. The more probable explanation is that Salcon is selling in an attempt to bring the stock down to a level where conversion of the convertible preferred would give Salcon control.
My own opinion is that the attempt to obtain an injunction will be rejected by the court.