Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

International Bio Recovery Corporation V.IBR



TSXV:IBR - Post by User

Comment by Flexy6on Feb 09, 2002 5:12pm
211 Views
Post# 4756199

RE: A choice Flexy.

RE: A choice Flexy.zDirtyLaundry wrote: "Serious investors trade shares mainly so they can realize a profit. If this large investor really did sell once Frank was suspended, then it would be logical to assume that they have no confidence in the new management." The stock did nothing but go down under Frank Dixon.--He did no fertilizer business.--He did no technology business.--He depleted the treasury to the benefit of his cronies. zDirtyLaundry wrote: "The Van Dyks own the private company called "Shearator Corpo.," and Shearator owns the patents. If IBR gets shut down, then the patent disputes will no longer be an issue, plus the Van Dyks won't have to contend with the IBR shareholders." What patent disputes are you talking about? There are no patent disputes, unless they exist in your head.
Bullboard Posts