RE: 39% is not "control" . Fuzzy math againwhiteguy wrote: 39% is not "control" . Fuzzy math again
39%, for your information, is considered to be more than adequate for working control. Again, every time you open your mouth, you demonstrate your ignorance of the corporate model.
You have spent several days commenting on a take-over that you denied had ever occurred. To the best of my knowledge, your opinion in regard to the Boustead deal was neither solicited or desired by any member of this forum. Your lengthy dissertation is a pitiful attempt to mask the obvious fact that you have no close relationship with Salcon and never did.
From my standpoint, you are nothing more than a pathological liar and extortionist. Now, if you really want me to expand into this area, just continue your pattern.
Why should a person who controls almost three million shares of IBR direct questions about that company to others? Not that I believe you control any shares of IBR but that was the claim you made at the time you proposed your extortion scheme to me.