Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

SSC Security Services Corp Ordinary Shares V.INP


Primary Symbol: INPCF

SSC Security Services Corp is a leading provider of physical and cyber security services to corporate and public sector clients across Canada.


OTCPK:INPCF - Post by User

Comment by WheresMeGoldon Mar 16, 2018 12:13am
152 Views
Post# 27725330

RE:Introducing myself

RE:Introducing myselfBrad, I followed INP for two years before investing. I almost instantly liked the business model. However, the tone of conference calls, the level of management ownership, and the shareholder-friendly nature of the company eventually convinced me to become a shareholder. Introducing yourself here and offering to answer questions reinforces my positive thoughts of the company.

There are two issues that cause me some concern. I understand the constraints you have in answering questions but any detail you can provide will be appreciated. 

First, I have read where others have suggested that the FCC offers generous levels of lending at low rates while Input Capital’s capital streams are the equivalent of high interest rate loans. This would suggest farmers who participate in capital streams are desperate for capital or not financially sophisticated. Obviously this would not bode well for Input Capital’s long term viability. Where are the faults in these suggestions and why would farmers turn to Input Capital over the FCC?

Second, I have been concerned that the level of new capital deployment has stalled and may soon shrink. I consider the results from this quarter to be critical and possibly make-or-break for many investors. With the marketing stream product now over a year old, along with the traditional capital stream, shouldn’t new deployment exceed $50M this year if the business model is sustainable and one that offers long-term growth?

And as a shareholder, thanks again Brad for introducing yourself to this message board to answer questions. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>