NR WOWOkay, so if we have the NAV at .45 which is a net asset value that they compute from month to month, then why didn't they pick a price for this to fill at?
Why is that left up in the air? I mean the .45 NAV is such a concrete number based on assets and the new assets will be the equivalent of the new money. So why not pick a price to fill this?
And btw, thanks for the answers.
And I agree that there are a lot of good banks and investment houses in this. That is a lot of big name support.