Kure Technologies Inc V.KUR.H

RE: A Shareholder Must

[gijane_]

//Orgy... Ask Jane who finaced the current BOD's fight... ask her if it was the same Russian who financed UBS and Alex all along.. ask her if the "clan" still owns its controllling share packet//

Orgy didn't ask me, but if he did, these would be my replies:

As usual, just because you state some innuendo, doesn't mean it is so.
And more likely than not, it isn't so.
I didn't know anyone had financed the current BOD's fight prior to their winning their current positions.
I do know they disclosed they were repaid expenses by both UBS and Look after having won.
It is right there in black in white in the MDA and elsewhere.
What proof, other than your say so - which we all know is totally unreliable - do you have of the existence of any  alleged Russian in the role you claim?
Is 6180 your source of such "reliable" information?
If so, why did you go to significant lengths to discredit him?


//I'd do the math for you byut you are an accountant..  I'm sure yu can add up Alex and family's shares and come to the conclusion he and Gerry and friends still control UBS..//
They still control UBS?
Really?
More of your wonderland logic?
Is that why they lost the last election?


//  Look has been handed off as predicted..  someone reward for helping with the wind down I suspect..//
Your suspicions are not fact.
Heck, even your "facts" are never facts, LOL


// but UBS is in the same spot it always was.. controlled by the same Russians that always did control it...  You're witnessing theater.. //
If this is theater, then surely you are the clown in this tragedy


//Ask Jane if she'd like to fill the board in on who assigned the thugs to watch over their investment in UBS.. and dispatced them accordingly when they felt it prudent..//
Jane has no idea what you are talking about.
But interestingly, both AD and McG used the "thug" approach you are so fond of recounting as a line of defense in their countersuits.
Good job helping them out Ian.


//P.S. Is Ag)ora)com and/or its paid posters on the Look/UBS payroll?  Is that why you are against a forensic audit? Just asking..  I always found it odd an accountant would argue against a forensic audit when the company in question has a history of hideous abuses going back over a decade...  one of those things that makes me go hmm...//
Clearly you can't read or comprehend.
Or if you can, you are yet again indulging in twisting other people's words, which is nothing new to you and comes as no surprise.
I don't want to put words in orgy's mouth, but he has made it abundantly clear he is not against a FA.
He has just pointed out a FA is not the be all and end all that you profess it to be.
That you continue to twist what others post makes just about everyone here go hmm...