RE:RE:RE:No thanks to the Nasdaq antonaki1 wrote: Have to agree, not a big fan of uplisting to the Nasdaq if it requires a consolidation of shares to do so.If you can't meet all requirements organically than it only opens you up to increased short selling when you go where you don't belong.
Redherring666 wrote: Boston132 wrote: If a reverse split is required! Let’s grow organically, prove our selves, let the SP rise on its own. 100% I will be voting ‘No’ if this is a requirement.
Anyone know who gets to vote? You can’t vote if you just own common shares can you?
With the crazy run up we had within the one or 2 months in late 2017, many, many people bought over 2.00 and many would lose a shite tonne of money if they reverse split. This is not a good idea and I’m not in favour of this, as I only see negative outcomes
think about it, when we were supposed to uplist to the TSX everyone said we had more opportunities for investors coming in etc etc and that hasn’t happened. Share price has still steadily declined. And now they want to do that again? But with a reverse split? Like wtf are they thinking?
This clearly tells me Sean is not knowing what he’s doing. He’s going to ruin the investment for all of us. I will not vote yes to a reverse split nor will I remain involved in a company that does such a thing. Only scam companies do that and I’ll be out