RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Assay ResultsTeam LME,
My view is that the sample preparation and assaying was not completed chronologically and results for the missing holes from today's PR are still outstanding from the lab.
You can Google search for a report titled "Analyst's Notes: How to read drill results & numbers to watch out for" Feb 16th, 2021 and draw your own conclusions.
The section titled Gaps in Drill Hole Numbering begins with:
Gaps in Drill Hole Numbering A good way for readers to verify that no holes have been left out is to check the numbering of the holes and whether, or not, there are gaps in the numbering. If there are, these could be the results of the company having had to abandon a hole because of drilling problems (but this should be specifically disclosed), or if the sample preparation and assaying was not done chronologically and results still outstanding. However, the ‘results outstanding’ reason should fall away after a few weeks.