RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New Press Release - LAURION ANNOUNCES PROPOSED NON-BROKERED PRIVATE PLACEMENT OF FLOW-THROUGH SHARES Re Part 1 - laying out the scenario as you have where you get less per share is NOT in your interest. But I would say that there are a lot more variables potentially at play than what you have laid out. What if a deal collapses and the company needs to survive another year - the cash on hand would be good for you then. If it turns out not to be necessary - I don't think that means it was bad. CEOs like Cynthia have to navigate their way through multiple scenarios and contingencies - taking advantage of the good things and protecting themselves from the bad things. We have to trust that she is doing this well.
To me - we just learned that people who either know everything we do - or know more than we do - just bought more LME stock. A lot more. If it happened in the market who knows where we would be trading? I don't - but it would likely be up from where we are.
I'm now all in on matlas' theory - that this is a sign of the end being near - a last kick at the can for those who are lucky enough to be close enough - and wealthy enough to take advantage. If your interest are best served by a deal getting gone - as I said - I don't think we'll get a clearer sign than this. That doesn't mean it IS clear - it couldn't still just be BAU as Stev says - but we won't get clearer. I'm going with it being good. Really, really good.