Going after the Science One would think the asset would be the place to work on first, given what Gill outlined months ago, for his needs on the cash side to get this going. Could be wrong, but thats maybe why its still at 6 cents and just spinning in mud. I think the relationships that are being created are not addressing the asset needs and if the asset does not meet certain specs, all the money spent and time is gone by the waste side. Why not prove the asset up first, than sign binding agreements that have no stipulations or what if's and move foward. Cash comes to those that have it in the ground and till one sees it and entrust it with science, cash will always be a struggle as well as development in any asset. Seems like the juniors who have been hurt hardest are the ones that need the most structure