Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Gabo Mining Ltd V.MDL

Medallion Resources Ltd. is focused on mid-stream separation and purification of rare earth oxides and salts (REOs) based on Ligand Assisted Displacement (LAD) Chromatography, enablement of upstream processing using the Company’s proprietary Medallion Monazite Process (MMP) technology, and marketing of magnetic REOs (neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, and terbium) to downstream rare earth permanent magnet producers and consumers. It has developed a process and business model for extraction of rare earth elements from monazite, which is a phosphate mineral that is a common by-product of heavy mineral sand operations. The Company holds exclusive rights to the patented LAD Chromatography rare earth element (REE) separation process developed to separate minerals from all raw material feed stocks excluding coal sources and recycled materials from manufacturing wastes and recyclates from battery and magnet sources. It is investing in the development of LAD Chromatography.


TSXV:MDL - Post by User

Comment by aushedson Nov 22, 2021 10:32am
80 Views
Post# 34152632

RE:Jack Lifton MDL

RE:Jack Lifton MDLMKB nailed it perfectly, yet another instance of Jack running his mouth on definitive terms on issues he hasn't research thoroughly.

Did Jack think Mark Saxon would not respond with the facts, as he obviously did with MKB, or did Jack prefer to make up his own version of events aka GW, MRT, et al?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>