RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Something to look at MDX Ummm, you think management has done "a very good job of telling you what they are doing"?
I couldn't disagree with you more. As example, this "announced” signed rumour about a partner in Brazil. I've heard mainly from you that there are performance benchmarks in the agreement. There would be no reason why more specific information could not be shared with the shareholders
1) what's their timeline to have "clinics' up and running
2) how many locations do they plan on initiating
3) what is the projected timeline for the first installation/ last installation
4) what’s their timeline for their version of FDA approval
That is just to start. there is nothing against the rules that says they can't announce minimums agreed upon in the terms.
There is nothing that should prevent them from providing information that could be confirmed by the average investor. You should not have to investigate to find any kind of information on a new partner.
In this video, it implies there is government support for the project. It would be nice to get a government official to identify themselves and make a statement to that effect.
Once again, I believe this technology is sound. and the fellow in the video is right that execution is key in the next 6 months. Unfortunately, the company does not provide the quality of information to make these projections outlined in the video believable.
I would hate to see the share price recede again; however, I find it too risky to add more money to this investment because of the lack of robust information provided by management. If the plans are robust, put them out there. If not, it would be better if they didn’t turn fairy tales into announcements