RE: Red Cliff's potential net profit My friend in your post you included this:
"
April 27 2012 | | | | | | | | |
DDH No. | From (m) | To (m) | Width (m) | Au g/t | Cu% | | | |
DDH-PJ-2011-1A | 73.02 | 112.2 | 39.18 | 0.28 | 0.24 | | | |
DDH-PJ-2011-2 | 7.32 | 57.62 | 50.3 | 0.02 | 0.14 | | | |
and | 71.65 | 88.11 | 16.4 | 0.93 | 1.09 | | | |
and | 88.11 | 95.43 | 7.32 | 0.05 | 0.26 | | | |
DDH-PJ-2011-3 | 8.84 | 57.62 | 48.78 | 0.02 | 0.12 | | | |
and | 57.62 | 72.65 | 15.03 | 0.13 | 0.32 | | | |
and | 90.64 | 100.3 | 9.66 | 1.54 | 0.6 | | | |
and | 100.3 | 139.64 | 39.63 | 0.02 | 0.14 | | | |
Average | 8 | holes/intervals | = | 0.37 | 0.36 |
These Assays are from the Prince John prospect, an entirely different property.
That being said, if you take these out of your calculations the average grade will increase significantly ;)