Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Must Capital Inc V.MUST.H

Must Capital Inc. is a Canada-based company, which is focused on identifying active business interests, both within and outside of the software industry. The Company has not identified or selected any additional specific investment opportunity or business.


TSXV:MUST.H - Post by User

Post by illumination1on Jan 19, 2017 12:40am
68 Views
Post# 25726408

Some Things To Think About!

Some Things To Think About!
Derek you are absolutely convinced that this is a garbage and laughable stock in which you are apparently stuck with and if that is the case and you are trying to warn people about why would Mackie who is an experienced investment broker agree to put its reputation on the line and recommend this company to any of their clients? What is $3,000/month vs being careless and negligent in taking a company to others to look at and invest in? Surely, Mackie being in the business of making money will scrutinize this company before even presenting it to their clients. I would imagine that they would look at the company's business plan, it's product whether it is through the website as I had done, read the company's press release as well as assess the viability and likelihood of it being successful. Mackie like myself and everyone else know that there are tons of medical screening and imaging companies out there and given if they are a company worth their ilk they will at least do their due diligence to try to weigh and comparison this one to all the rest. Granted, brokerage houses who take a position in an investment are looking to be able to sell it to retailers at a price that they believe the market is willing to pay for it. Another thing to look at is the last successful 3.12 million raise which is by way of debenture warrants and options convertible to company shares at the .40 mark. Apparently, to be able to close the tranche and successfully do the raise investors were willing to pay $1,000 for that opportunity--see the news release relating to this fact. Among those who did the underwriting is a company by the name of Gravitas which is an Ontario base company who I never heard of before coming across another company Acuity ad holdings who had earned a bought deal by Gravitas. Again, I will ask why will companies who want to be seen as reputable and fair simply back a company which is total garbage headed by who you call a scammer? Nevertheless, one can not fully guarantee anything with products and services as often is stated in cautionary notes that material results may vary so yes, there is always considerable amounts of risk not only here but with many other stocks mostly small caps. Like I said, the majority are most likely heavy in the red and survive based on dilution, dilution and consolidation providing that brokerage houses and those who support the companies see something of value in them where they can sell to the retailers. If you have level two and if you saw today's levels there was 25,000 bids put out by someone trading through Mackie at .04 and a fairly healthy amounts near 100,00 at .035. Now if Mackie didn't value this company it wouldn't have taken it on and even still recommend it to people who are trading through them to having price points at the .03 plus mark which will in my eyes indicate that this equity has bottomed out and people are more than willing to gamble on it. Now the brokerage houses will do their part the rest is up to the sales and management team to go out and pound the pavement establishing why its platform should be the one of choice. In any case, these are my thoughts as to why I have invested here but I do expect people to form their own opinions while doing their dd to see whether this equity is worth taking a risk on. You know obviously I did and that was the reason I poured money into here. As it stands I will hold to what I said--.05-.10 is more than a fair price for this company anything lower than that I personally and strongly believe people are getting a deal. Will this equity have large volumes--probably not for awhile until more people become aware of it and when more and more news comes out about how the company is progressing along. This investment isn't a simple come and flip thing for me as I see more value than even doubling out in this. I had mentioned that Mdx was at .40 high before crashing--this was .30 and has listed on the Canadian exchange. Just because it is having a bumpy ride early on and is in the red doesn't make it garbage or not worthy to be considered it just makes it a typical penny like the rest of them. glta
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>