Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Monexa Technologies Corp V.MXA



TSXV:MXA - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by IPX2006on Jun 27, 2006 9:37am
101 Views
Post# 11037074

share price

share price"In January and February, the company performed as predicted with recurring revenue of approximately $800,000 per month. With service delivery for these new and amended contracts beginning in the second quarter of the year, the company expects to add more than $75,000 to monthly recurring revenue by the end of June 2006." "With the new business noted above, IP Applications remains on track to be cash self-sufficient on operations in 2006 and does not expect to need to raise additional equity capital to finance operations." $10 - $11 million in revenues Profitable and cash flow positive at some point in 2006 At some point these shares have to break out of this range. Market cap. of $4 million suggests this management team does/knows nothing about attracting investors. If Mr. Jacobson had any sort of investor following we are at $1.00. I read that about 80% of the outstanding shares are held. Why is everyone just watching? Either add to your positions or sell and get someone in who will. I'm talking about shareholders with 300,000 shares or more. Not us small shareholders. Does anyone not agree with this?
Bullboard Posts
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse