Post by
HHAPPY on Sep 10, 2008 4:18pm
I wouldn't be surprised if TSX
requires NAG to amend their news release as nit being 43-101 compliant . TSX will probably want a PR with watered down numbers.
Jusr remember current spot price of -bituminous is $148.00 a ton and most articles are saying the price of coal will rise as more "clean coal" is utilized.
All the naysayers re NAG's ability to handle both Saskatchewan gigantic holdings and West Virginia is ridiculous. Both from a stand point of having expert geologists on staff and such things as J/V or other equity investors in the wings which will minimize dilution of shatres.
Only dilution may come from more deals. Bring them on.!!
Comment by
RCisback on Sep 10, 2008 4:21pm
1.5 billion dollars (aprox). in coal.Love it.A new nr does not make the 100 million tons disapear.
Comment by
bert2818 on Sep 10, 2008 5:21pm
" NAG's ability to handle both Saskatchewan gigantic holdings.."And where and how large would that gigantic holding be? so far it was only 'potential'. I have have a potential ton of gold in my back yard, anyone interested; anyone interested if I hire a PR firm and spend 50 000 a month on advertising?
Comment by
HHAPPY on Sep 10, 2008 5:55pm
Your right I should have used thr word"possible" before gigantic. I am always talking about waiting for assays ,I should listen to myself more often,