Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Post by HHAPPYon Sep 10, 2008 4:18pm
250 Views
Post# 15446108

I wouldn't be surprised if TSX

I wouldn't be surprised if TSXrequires NAG to amend their news release as nit being 43-101 compliant . TSX will probably want a PR with watered down numbers.
Jusr remember current spot price of -bituminous is $148.00 a ton and most articles are saying the price of coal will rise as more "clean coal" is utilized.
All the naysayers re NAG's ability to handle both Saskatchewan gigantic holdings and West Virginia is ridiculous. Both from a stand point of having expert geologists on staff and such things as J/V or other equity investors in the wings which will minimize dilution of shatres.
Only dilution may come from more deals. Bring them on.!!
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse