RE: Waydago happyhickchick.au d'Contraire / Hozameen / Catmscat
Gee Lightweight, I can't for the life of me figure out why people listening to these interviews and forming their own opinions would cause you so much angst. Do you have something to hide?
You are aware aren't you that not everyone who has a negative opinion on a stock is labeled a basher right?
I realize that you have posted completely contradictory information on the same day on different boards (positive on the one you held, then the opposite information on the one you didn't hold) but I'll let others decide for themselves if that qualifies you as a manipulator or not.
It's true that your multi-alias's may appear to cast you in a poor light. Particularly in instances such as those below where, as Hozameen, you encourage people to trust your other alias, au Contraire:
Hozameen0
9/13/2008 | | Post #23726806
Even your own points go over your head, hickey. There is a certain subtlety about these boards and they are also a game of charades and masquerades. There are quite a few real intelligent members here who do know the subject. It is our job to sift and try to find out which ones know what they are talking about. You most certainly do not. I have a few friends here who think that I do. So has A C. You are not among them .. your loss. I like these Boards and I have the time to post on them.
AuContraire3
9/22/2008 11:27:04 PM | Post #23748782
It just reinforces what a trivial FOOL you are. Nobody cares about that in my case .. besides .. it is only your opinion. And never at any time did I even imply that Stockhouse consults me for anything. One of their editors pointed out to me that having multiple aliases is indeed a violation of their rules and I was given the choice of either Hozameen or AuContraire. That person did say that he enjoyed reading my posts. Anyhow it's all history now and you can persist with it if you wish. But I am certain most of the members are getting sick of your pestering me. Try talking about this Company for a change. If you can.
Then as Hozameen, you slag North American Gems coal experts, only to claim as au Contraire that you would never do such a thing:
Hozameen0
9/13/2008 3:12:11 PM | | Post #23726741
Rate this: BUSTED!
The difference between you and me, hickey is that I have been there and done all that stuff, whereas you have not and you have no background in this field. I have had big names on several of my companies .. as Board members, as consultants, and as members of Advisory Boards. I paid them for their names and rarely did they contribute more than that. Unlike you with your closed mind, I'll stay neutral here re the Goo Roos until I read that they have actually done something. There is no one else in the NAG team capable of running much more than a paytoilet franchise. Mining coal ??? DO NOT MAKE ME LAUGH !!!!!!
AuContraire3
9/23/2008 12:47:45 AM | Post #23748918
re your favorite 2 Goo Roos, that they were being paid mainly for their names. I said it could be the case. You spin so badly. It adds to your rep as the Stockhouse FOOL. Apparently you know nothing about Professionalism. As a Professional myself I would leave myself wide open to out and out accuse 2 Peers of doing something like that. I do however say that perhaps they did. I have done it myself, and also had it done to me. But any Pro who does that at least puts in an appearance once in a while and makes a minimum contribution. Perhaps that is what your Goo Roos are doing.
As well as your endorsement of bashers on other boards as "experts" and "highly educated professionals" claiming to know them well and strongly encouraging others to buy into their "schtick" only to admit a short time later that you nothing about the guy other than what he fed you in an inbox.
But, again, having said all that, I'll let others come to their own conclusions about you and whether or not you are a "manipulator." If you are "attempting" to be a manipulator, I would have to say that you are so transparent that anyone you sucker in should take a long look in the mirror.
I would, however, encourage anyone reading these boards to take into consideration they would be better off taking a hot tip from a stranger they meet on the street. At least you can see their face which is a lot better than a cyber nickname.
Wouldn't you agree Lightweight?
Obviously not. You would prefer that people buy into your posts, hook, line and sinker, because you claim to be an expert that just happens to be hiding behind Mama Stockhouse's skirts along with the rest of your gang of thugs that play off of each other.
Now tell me Lightweight, is that advice in the best interests of Stockhouse posters?
Personally, I don't think so, but I would encourage Stockhouse posters to decide that for themselves.
By the way, I thought you had me on ignore?
HH
FAST FACTS: Hozameen/Catmsan/ formerly auContraire.
Before he was apparently banned from Stockhouse on June 13, 2008, auContraire had amassed a stunning 271 ignores. He appears to have reinvented himself that same day as Hozameen (currently at an impressive 73 ignores) and lately, on the private board as Catmsan.
Has openly admitted lying on this board to mislead shareholders, and, until he saw the light, was bashing here approximately 30-50 times a day. Post #23132682.
PUMPING: GXS and WGF
QUOTE: After several days of relentless bashing posted: “NAG is one of the players in the area now. I can't buy it because my capital is all tied up in GXS and WGF.” Post #23139780.
QUOTE: Though he’s been bashing since the beginning, and continues to do so on May 23 commented: This is going to be a great area play. Post #23159663.
QUOTE: After aggressively defending his claim that the NAG discovery is 200 miles away from the GXS discovery, has since posted distances of 100 and 160 miles. After posting these 3 distances, on June 3, 2008, he posted that he didn’t know where the NAG strike is. Post #23412482
QUOTE: Though he attacks anyone who puts forward a positive argument on behalf of this company, when asked why he attacks this company regularly, he claimed: “It's R C who I despise. Nothing else.” Post #23484477