Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Comment by mudder66on Apr 20, 2009 9:18am
275 Views
Post# 15930612

Keep up the informative posts drummer

Keep up the informative posts drummerwhile Charles and his puppets(mdzgn,wortep,hhappy,goofinfo,rcisoncrack) stick their heads in the sand drummerboy keeps things real by posting facts. Fact is that coal supplies are increasing whle prices are dropping and as long as the natural gas prices are as low as they are and the recession continues the coal oversupply will continue to rise and coal prices will continue to drop. So how can NAG and it's management become a coal producer??? First of all just look at NAGs past history, this management team have never been successful at anything let alone become a coal miner. Also where is NAG going to get the cash to begin coal production, any cash they had they lent to Charles other venture in KBC.V who I doubt will ever pay it back by Charles self imposed deadline which has already been delayed. So the other option is to go the the market for another large private placement further diluting the already high outstanding shares in NAGs float. And I believe that NAG will not be able to raise any cash in the market, who will want to invest in NAG who wants to start mining coal with no resource estimate let alone a pre feasiblility to back up a profitable mining operation not to mention the falling coal prices. So while Charles would like shareholders or potential investors believe that NAG will become a profitable coal miner the fundamentals paints a different picture to the contrary. This of course is all IMHO. 

GLTA
Mud

Hurry up and get this post pulled charles before to many people read it.lol
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse