Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Comment by mansion2on Oct 19, 2010 8:13pm
316 Views
Post# 17584882

RE: RE: RE: RE: #3

RE: RE: RE: RE: #3Mine #3.....

Just from what I know going back to last year....
Mine #1 was delayed delayed delayed due to bad weather and was only supposed to help Nag get their feet wet we all knew this.. which is fine...It ended alot quicker than thought...

Mine #2 was originally Now mine #3 ....  then there was a NR that stated they bought a existing permit and transfered it renamed it.... mine #2 and the old mine #2 is now mine #3.....

I don't know enough about The present #2 mine except before you get to blue gem you have to get thru jellico and dean coal which is still good stuff...


REGARDLESS>>>>

The old #2 mine now #3 mine is the big one!  The frustrating thing is the delays which I Believe NAG management didn't count on...  Speaking to an operator down there about a year ago about Nag When mine #1 was runnning and Now mine #3 which was  mine #2.... He stated he didn't belive Mine #1 was able to produce 8000-10000 tonnes a month for very long!  However he said mine #3 would be profitable because no one ever worked it and it has at least 20 -25 years even at 20,000 to 30,000 tonnes a month... Alot of operators will bid to work mine  #3 a year ago #2.  I think nag is just at a stage of getting approval for the operator in order to fix the roads and go from there.....It should happen hopefylly sooner than later...

Anyways that is all i got


Mad Money....


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse