Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Post by mdzgn2006on Dec 03, 2010 4:18pm
329 Views
Post# 17798330

Unsubstantiated hearsay

Unsubstantiated hearsayis what you are spreading.

20 minutes before the close on Friday.

You did not say when your call took place and who you spoke with.

And even if you did speak with someone, whatever was said is filtered through you and your interpretation.

Lastly, I have no reason to believe that you own a single NAG share or if you partcipated in the PP. So to use that as an argument to establish your credibility is suspect at best.

If you want to be credible, publish your name,  IP number and your contact phone #.....after all, you are claiming to publish news.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse