Post by
Wangotango67 on Jun 24, 2020 12:11pm
IDEAS - 2
Has the geologist ever tested the,
Palladium, Platinum, Rhodium for paramagnetic charateristics ?
Pd, Pt, Rd, are known to be partially magnetic, sometimes picking up other alloy metals.
Nickel...is present, Nickel is magnetic and associated to the PGM's.
A simple assay of PFM ores should be performed to know for ceertainid, paramagnetic plays a role in this style of deposit.
Which is a tie in - to the next subject - Goose Chase
Here are two different charbaility maps for Nam's claims - covering - Dana Zone + Pine Zone
#1
https://www.thenewswire.com/data/tnw/clients/img/200ba413bf173067e12a778009044345.png
#2
https://www.thenewswire.com/data/tnw/clients/img/f318ecc01bdd2879e6e0a1f103756387.png
See anything unisual ?
That's right - each map portrays an entirely different charability reading.
First map shows no red zones.
While the second map shows red zones.
If both maps are referred to - it might lead the junior on a wild goose chase.
Question becomes - which is the more accurate - survey ?
What would be nice to see...?
Seeing an over lay of all drill holes and.... intercept HITS (reading of cores )
placed over survey #1
Then...
intergrating the lab values of ( potentially ) paramagnetic vzalues id PGM's show this trait.
The end result would allow for a more accurate pinpoint - as to where the PGM's are most prone.
Nothing wrong with exploratory drtilling -
But...when you have an already made resource = exploratorty steals the thunder of the established resource and then creates a scenerio of - sp will be guaged on exploratory drilling - which is why a nuetralizing factor should be used as a counter measure - meaning - more drill holes in a known sure area to off set the exploratory - just in case the exploratory misses.