RE:RE:RE:NRS I’m not sure that it’s a bad thing, but it’s not a common thing.
So I ask
-As Sentient has an outright majority, what protection do shareholders have from Sentient not acting more in their own interest in a M&A situation due to possible conflicts of interest with their other vast investments rather than in the best interest of the minority shareholders?
Not that this would be an outright losing proposition for us, but could it not limit the up side?
Just thoughts, not being a troll on purpose.